056e2237-0346-49fe-b123-4999c149156a Comparative Effectiveness of Methylphenidate vs. Second‑ and Third‑Line Medications for Children with Attention- Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Chief Investigator: Professor Samuele Cortese, NIHR Research Professor, University of Southampton Co-Investigator: Miguel Garcia Argibay, Senior Research Fellow, University of Southampton Team: Laura Nisbet, Mental Health Nurse, lead neurodevelopmental pathway, Hampshire and Isle of Wight Foundation NHS Trust Partners : Hampshire and Isle of Wight Foundation NHS Trust, University of Southampton Start: 1 10 2024 End: 31 3 2026 Aims of the study: This study wants to find out which medications work best for children who have both Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and autism. We are especially interested in learning whether the most commonly used medication for ADHD (called methylphenidate) works well for children who have both ADHD and autism, or if a different medication would be better. Background: Many children with ADHD also have autism. Right now, doctors usually treat ADHD with methylphenidate, but the studies that recommended this medicine didn't include children who have both ADHD and autism. So, we need to see if this medication works as well for children with both conditions. How We Will Do the Study: We are going to look at existing information (data) from the UK and abroad (Sweden), about thousands of children who have both ADHD and autism. We will compare different groups of children: Those who started with methylphenidate (the usual ADHD medicine). Those who started with other types of medication. Those who switched between different medications. Those who did not take any medication. We'll check how often these children needed to go to the hospital or emergency room, if they had any injuries, or if they had issues with self-harm. This will help us figure out which medicines work better and are safer. We will also use special techniques to make sure the comparison between the groups is fair and considers any other factors that might affect the results. Patient, public and community involvement : We believe this study will help doctors treat children with both ADHD and autism better. That’s why we’ll work closely with people who have lived experience of these conditions, both locally and internationally. Locally, we will involve people with lived experience from the Solent Academy of Research and Improvement team and Southampton Primary Care Research Centre. Nationally, we will work with representatives of the ADHD Foundation- Neurodiversity charity, the largest association people with lived experience of ADHD and autism in the UK. Internationally, we’ll partner with representatives of ADHD Europe, which is the largest European group for people with neurodiverse conditions like ADHD and autism. Professor Cortese has ongoing collaborations with all these partners. These people will help us at every stage of the research: designing the study, choosing what results to focus on, and sharing the findings with others. Sharing the Results: Once the study is finished, we will share the results with doctors and healthcare providers to help them make better decisions for treating children with both ADHD and autism. This may lead to changes in treatment guidelines and improve care for these kids. The findings will be published in medical journals, presented at conferences, and shared on public websites and in publications, especially those aimed at families of children with ADHD and autism.

4f21e11e-3fe7-460c-9bc0-113a56eec7a5 The ImPACt study - Improving physical activity of older people in the community Club members at Brendoncare joining in group exercise Principal Investigator: Dr Stephen Lim Team members: Dr Stephen Lim (NIHR Clinical Lecturer in Geriatric Medicine, Academic Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton), Professor Helen Roberts (Professor of Medicine for Older People, Academic Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton), Dr Samantha Meredith (Research Fellow, Academic Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton) , Dr Kinda Ibrahim (Senior Research Fellow, Academic Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton), Esther Clift (Consultant Practitioner in Frailty, Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Lymington New Forest Hospital), Samantha Agnew (Head of Clubs Services, The Brendoncare Foundation , Winchester), Pam Holloway (Patient representative) Start: 1 February 2020 Ended: 31 October 2021 Project Partners: University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Brendoncare. Lay summary Physical activity is important for older people. It has many benefits including maintaining older people’s ability to perform activities of daily living, be independent, and improve their well-being. However, many older adults living in the community do not engage in regular physical activity. Findings We found that we could train volunteers to support older people during the COVID-19 pandemic to stay active by performing exercises that help strengthen their muscles. Trained volunteers from Brendoncare led the online group exercises for older people who attended online community clubs during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was a challenging time when social distancing and lockdown rules were in place, which limited opportunities for older people to stay active. We recruited 19 volunteers, and 15 volunteers completed the training. The volunteers were mainly female (78%), with an average age of 68 years. The exercises were seated exercises and older adults were given exercise bands to increase the exercise intensity. Halfway through the study, lockdown restrictions were lifted, and some groups continued the group exercise in a face-to-face setting. The volunteers led 184 group weekly exercise sessions (127 online and 57 in-person). Thirty older adults participated in the group exercises. We interviewed volunteers, older adults and Brendoncare staff to find out more about what they thought of the online group exercise. The older adults enjoyed the intervention and understood the benefits of exercising. Additionally, they felt that they could exercise in a relaxed way with their peers without fear of being judged. The group exercises helped reduce social isolation and motivated older adults to engage with the exercises. Volunteers were enthusiastic to support the exercise groups. They appreciated the training and opportunity to lead the group exercises. One volunteer reported that the role gave her a sense of purpose by playing an active role the community club. Brendoncare staff members were a great help to the older adults and supported them with any issues, in particular those who were less familiar with the internet. At six months, we found that older adults who participated in the group exercise had an improved physical activity level. The time spent in light physical activity per week improved from an average of 1530 minutes per week to 1620 minutes per week. Only two minor incidents happened during the group exercises. Two participants experienced worsening of old injuries while performing the exercises. The programme trainer ensured the participants were safe and adapted the exercise for them. Overall, we found that volunteers can be trained to lead online group seated exercises. The exercises were safe and older adults enjoyed the exercises as well as the social interaction in the group setting. What we did with the new knowledge We supported Brendoncare in continuing the exercise groups after the study had ended. We presented our study findings to the board of trustees and demonstrated the exercises. Brendoncare has since employed an activity coordinator to continue to role of training volunteers and supporting volunteer-led exercise groups within Brendoncare. We trained the activity coordinator and shared our exercise sheets and other study materials to help Brendoncare develop their own training package. They are now actively recruiting more volunteers to lead group exercises in their community clubs. https://www.brendoncare.org.uk/get-involved/support-us/volunteering/#:~:text=Chair%20Based%20Exercise%20Volunteer,improving%20their%20health%20and%20wellbeing . We have developed a volunteer toolkit which is available to share with other volunteer organisations. The toolkit has recently been shared with Valley Leisure Ltd, a charitable leisure organisation, who have developed their offer of volunteer-based community clubs in Test Valley. Where next? Having explored how we can train volunteers to engage with healthy community-dwelling older adults to stay active through online group exercises, we collaborated with researchers from the Southampton Biomedical Research Centre and Bournemouth University to further develop this volunteer-led online intervention. We successfully secured research funding (£51,000) from University Hospital Southampton NHS FT to conduct a study to explore a multimodal intervention consisting of exercise, nutrition and behaviour change support, to engage with older people living with frailty who have been discharged from hospital, to stay active and eat well. This research has now been completed (10/01/2024) and we showed that it was feasible to translate the programme to support older people living with frailty ( COMPLETED: Wessex Frail2Fit – A feasibility and acceptability study of a virtual multi-modal intervention delivered by volunteers to improve functional outcomes of older adults with COVID-19 discharged from hospital ). What did people say about the work? Volunteer : “We do it because we want to help others…. we enjoy it. I'm gonna go back to belonging again, I feel that I'm benefiting from the group. Because again, I feel like I belong to that group….. I get so much out of it.” Club member: ‘We are not self-conscious when they (volunteers) are around. We have a laugh as well.’ Club member: ‘I’ve really enjoyed it because it keeps you in touch with people, especially during this COVID….. I still feel as if I’m part of a group.’ NEWS: ImPACT volunteers recognised for their wor k ImPACt exercise video IMPACT Exercise with Steve and Esther from NIHR ARC Wessex on Vimeo . Impact Exercise video using Resistance bands - Dr Sam Meredith watch the video on Vimeo Publications doi.org Volunteer-led physical activity interventions to improve health outcomes for community-dwelling older people: a systematic review - Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Background Physical activity (PA) is important for older people to maintain functional independence and healthy ageing. There is strong evidence to support the benefits of physical activity interventions on the health outcomes of older adults. Nonetheless, innovative approaches are needed to ensure that these interventions are practical and sustainable. Aim This systematic review explores the effectiveness of volunteer-led PA interventions in improving health outcomes for community-dwelling older people. Methods Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro, Cochrane library) were systematically searched for studies using trained volunteers to deliver PA interventions for community-dwelling older people aged ≥ 65 years. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to included study heterogeneity. Results Twelve papers describing eight studies (five papers reported different outcomes from the same study) were included in the review. All eight studies included strength and balance exercises and frequency of PA ranged from weekly to three times a week. Volunteer-led exercises led to improvements in functional status measured using the short physical performance battery, timed up and go test, Barthel Index, single leg stand, step touch test, chair stand test, and functional reach. Frailty status identified by grip strength measurement or the use of long-term care insurance improved with volunteer-led exercises. Interventions led to improvement in fear of falls and maintained or improved the quality of life. The impact on PA levels were mixed. Conclusion Limited evidence suggests that volunteer-led PA interventions that include resistance exercise training, can improve outcomes of community-dwelling older adults including functional status, frailty status, and reduction in fear of falls. More high-quality RCTs are needed to investigate the effects of volunteer-led PA interventions among older people. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1442-0 https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2022-0283 doi.org Detecting low-intake dehydration using bioelectrical impedance analysis in older adults in acute care settings: a systematic review - BMC Geriatrics Background Dehydration is a frequent cause of excess morbidity and poor health outcomes, particularly in older adults who have an increased risk of fluid loss due to renal senescence, comorbidities, and polypharmacy. Detecting dehydration is key to instigating treatment to resolve the problem and prevent further adverse consequences; however, current approaches to diagnosis are unreliable and, as a result, under-detection remains a widespread problem. This systematic review sought to explore the value of bioelectrical impedance in detecting low-intake dehydration among older adults admitted to acute care settings. Methods A literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was undertaken from inception till May 2022 and led to the eventual evaluation of four studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for observational studies; three studies had a high risk of bias, and one had a low risk. Data were extracted using systematic proofs. Due to insufficient reporting, the data were analysed using narrative synthesis. Results One study showed that the sensitivity and specificity of bioelectrical impedance in detecting low-intake dehydration varied considerably depending on the total body water percentage threshold used to ascertain dehydration status. Other included studies supported the technique's utility when compared to conventional measures of hydration status. Conclusions Given the scarcity of literature and inconsistency between findings, it is not possible to ascertain the value of bioelectrical impedance for detecting low-intake dehydration in older inpatients. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/3/e069533 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2260134125000854[SM1] doi.org Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of virtual group exercise for older adults delivered by trained volunteers: the ImPACt study protocol Introduction Physical activity is important for healthy ageing. Despite strong evidence on the benefits of physical activity for health and well-being, physical inactivity remains a significant problem among older adults. This study aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an online volunteer-led group exercise for older adults. Methods A quasi-experimental mixed-methods approach will be used in this study. A training programme will be developed to train volunteers to deliver online group exercises to older adults aged >65 years (n=30). The primary outcome is the feasibility of implementing the intervention. This will be assessed by the number of volunteers recruited, trained, and retained at the end of the study, and the number of exercise sessions delivered and completed by participants. Secondary outcomes include physical activity levels measured using the Community Health Model Activities Programme for Seniors questionnaire, Barthel Index, EQ-5D-5L as a measure of health-related quality of life, SARC-F to determine sarcopenia status, and PRIMSA-7 to determine frailty status. Outcomes will be measured at baseline and at 6 months. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with volunteers(n=5), older adults (n=10) and family members (n=5) to explore their views on the intervention. Analysis Simple descriptive statistics will be used to describe participant characteristics, the feasibility of the study and the impact of the intervention on health outcomes. Parametric(t-test) or non-parametric(Mann-Whitney U test) statistics will be used to analyse continuous variables. χ2 test will be used for categorical variables. Qualitative data will be analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Ethics and dissemination This study received ethical approval from the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee and Research Integrity and Governance committee (ID: 52 967 .A1). Study findings will be made available to service users, voluntary organisations and other researchers who may be interested in implementing the intervention. Trial registration number [NCT04672200][1]. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04672200&atom=%2Fbmjopen%2F12%2F2%2Fe052631.atom · 40 Faces of Brendoncare - Sharon Green · 40 Faces of Brendoncare - Dr Sam Meredith · 2022 Winners | Pride of Andover Awards · https://www.linkedin.com/posts/karen-lewis-6b009665_ahpsday-activity-7385000352397385728-8v1K?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAGAmYqMBCL-wtu3ZnECr4UsylRfjAyKeGFY · https://youtu.be/nMSQR7kp9ec · https://youtu.be/6vxyL4OenmQ?si=RiOBz-yU7tO09fwX

65894af6-1d61-4f27-8b10-ff3b90451d8b Safer Nursing Care Tool and nurse staffing requirements What did we learn We found that for some wards using the Safer Nursing Care Tool (SNCT) gives a good estimate of the number of nursing staff needed. However, for other wards, relying on the estimate provided by this tool without further thought could lead to unsafe staffing levels for different reasons. For example, the current guidance recommends setting staffing levels to meet the average requirement, but following this logic, 18 wards in the three Trusts would often have been short-staffed. Also, a quarter of wards needed a sample of over 182 days to estimate the number of staff needed precisely, when the current recommendation is 20 days. Nursing workforce leaders at the three Trusts suggested characteristics of wards where the tool performed least well, for instance, high patient throughput and differences in workload between mornings and evenings. What difference can this new knowledge make? This project and the previous related project (NIHR-funded study https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr08160 ) led to a direct collaboration with NHS England and NHS Improvement and an invitation to work with them to further develop and update the guidance on using the Safer Nursing Care Tool. The team have spoken about the research findings and implications at a series of NHS Improvement safe staffing fellows training events. They have co-developed a set of resources to help nurses plan staffing. Impact has been achieved through this research shaping revised guidelines published by NHS England and NHS Improvement on using the SNCT in combination with professional judgement to determine nurse staffing requirements. We were invited to help facilitate workshops to co-develop a template for nurses to record their professional judgements. We are also in early-stage discussions with hospital managers in Greece about how the professional judgement framework might be relevant there, as well as discussions about how to achieve wider reach through the World Health Organization website. Why is this important? The professional judgement framework we developed as a result of these projects will benefit nurses, who use this tool nationally, by giving them concrete guidance on issues to consider when deciding staffing levels. It will benefit patients admitted to inpatient wards, through better matching of staffing levels to demand. Having too few nursing staff is related to adverse effects for patients (more deaths, more falls, longer stays in hospital), staff (turnover, sickness) and organisations (higher costs from temporary staff to fill gaps). Diagram 1 We presented the list of wards which were flagged as having overall poor fit to three nursing workforce leaders Some of the common factors they suggested as potential reasons for poor fit are shown here above. They highlighted wards with large morning-evening differences in staffing requirements (based on acuity-dependency ratings) may be among those where the tool fits least well. For wards that are particularly small or large, it is possible that the number generated by the SNCT is less likely to be sufficient to maintain minimum registered nurse levels when rostering staff to shifts. They highlighted some ward characteristics that mean the SNCT multipliers, as they are applied, may underestimate the true workload. These were high patient turnover, older patient population, cancer infusion/device activity. a high proportion of patients requiring one-to-one care AKA enhanced care/specialling. The factors suggested are on the whole congruent with published evidence What next? Our next step is conducting research predicting demand for nursing staff which we plan will also lead to tools and resources to guide decision-making around staffing. Research team: • Professor Peter Griffiths, Chair of Health Services, University of Southampton • Rosemary Chable, Deputy Director of Nursing, Education & Workforce, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust • Nicky Sinden, Head of Nursing Workforce, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust • Tracy Moran, Lead Nurse for Nursing Workforce, Education & Practice, Poole Hospital NHS Trust Project partners: • University of Southampton • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust • Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust • Poole Hospital NHS Trust More information Evi dence Brief Publication 24_11_Professional_Judgement_Staffing_Eprints[16] .pdf Download PDF • 186KB Publications: Saville, Christina and Griffiths, Peter (2021) Ward staffing guided by a patient classification system: A multi-criteria analysis of “fit” in three acute hospitals. Journal of Nursing Management, 29 (7), 2260-2269. ( doi:10.1111/jonm.13341 ). Saville C, Griffiths P, Casey A, Chable R, Chapman H, Radford M, and Watts N (2023) Professional Judgement Framework, doi: 10.5258/SOTON/P1102 University of Southampton ( https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/P1102 ) Saville, Christina and Griffiths, Peter , Ejebu, Ourega-Zoé and Fogg, Carole (eds.) (2023) Introducing the Professional Judgement Framework to guide nurse staffing decisions (Evidence Brief, 24) 2pp. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/484412 Saville, Christina and Griffiths, Peter , Ejebu, Ourega-Zoé and Fogg, Carole (eds.) (2024) Nurse staffing decisions: the Professional Judgement Framework. Nursing Times, 120 (7). https://www.nursingtimes.net/c...4-06-2024/ The Safer Nursing Care Tool as a guide to nurse staffing requirements on hospital wards: observational and modelling study ( nihr.ac.uk ) Video: Computer simulation what and why? https://sho.co/1E34T The importance of professional judgement in nurse staffing decisions https://southampton.cloud.panopto.eu/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=87fcb9bb-e9dc-4b43-8377-acb700e3bec2 Here is the orginal research outline Identifying wards for which the Safer Nursing Care Tool is appropriate for assessing nurse staffing requirements Principal Investigator: Dr Christina Saville Team members: Dr Christina Saville (Research Fellow, University of Southampton) Professor Peter Griffiths (Chair of Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton), Rosemary Chable RN (Deputy Director of Nursing, Education & Workforce, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust) Ms Nicky Sinden (Head of Nursing Workforce at Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust), Tracy Moran (Lead Nurse for Nursing Workforce, Education & Practice, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust) Start: 1 December 2019 End: 1 August 2020 Partners: University of Southampton, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Lay summary It is important to have enough qualified (registered) nurses looking after patients staying on hospital wards, because having too few is associated with worse patient care and more patient deaths. On the other hand, there are extreme shortages of nurses, so having “too many” on a ward could be considered a waste. The Safer Nursing Care Tool is used in many hospital wards in England to work out the number of nursing staff (including nursing assistants) needed. However, a recent study showed that it is more suitable on some wards than on others. For example, we found that factors not accounted for in the tool, e.g. whether a ward is surgical or medical, and the proportion of single rooms, also affected professional judgement of whether staffing was adequate. Aim This study aims to understand which ward characteristics mean that the Safer Nursing Care Tool gives a good estimate of the nursing staff required, and which ward characteristics mean that the number might need to be adjusted or further considered by taking into account the expertise of ward leaders. It also aims, if possible, to provide some general rules or an add-on tool to help nursing managers with setting staffing levels. Methods We will analyse the data that were collected for a previous study in a different way. This time we will focus on differences between wards rather than hospitals. We will use analytical techniques for finding patterns in data to identify similar wards. In our team we have experienced leaders in nursing who will provide expert professional insights into ward characteristics. Patient, public and community involvement and sharing results We will involve nursing managers in the study because they are the potential users of any rules or tools we develop. We plan to develop a resource (rules or a tool) for nursing ward managers and to run a workshop to test use of this resource. We plan to write one academic paper about what we find out. We also can share the plans for this with lay members from the PPI group as appropriate. We are developing a smaller user group across Workforce and Frailty and Older People teams.

d6d7fb08-5eb7-4cab-afcf-359d64b8fe12 ADOPTED PROJECT: Young people’s barriers to mental health services Lead: Dr. Corine Driessens Co-Investigator: Professor Peter W F Smith Kim Markham Jones & Fiona Lacey – YoungMinds Nicole Davenport, Mahdi Hassan, Shahrbano Iqbal, Friday Skelton – young researchers recruited by and in employ of YoungMinds Starting date: October 2022 Ended: July 2025 Published in journal of psychiatric research online: Use or no use? Young People's engagement with mental health services https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2026.01.034 Many young people in the UK experience anxiety or depression, but most can’t get mental health support when they need it. From the very beginning of this project, young people, both as young researchers and as participants in four co-production workshops, played a central role in shaping our questions, interpreting the findings, and explaining what the results mean in real life. Their insight guided every stage of the work. This study looked at what affects whether young people use mental health services and what happens to those who don’t. The biggest factor in getting help was whether health care professionals recognized the young person’s distress was a mental health disorder. Other things like, severity of symptoms, being a female, having fewer supportive people around, or having unemployed parents played a smaller role. Young people who didn’t use services were less likely to be female, come from single-parent families, have caring responsibilities, or have been bullied. They were also more likely to have good relationships with their parents. Those who did use services had poorer outcomes later in adulthood, suggesting they faced greater difficulties overall. Because specialist mental health services are overstretched, responsibility has shifted to GPs and teachers, who often feel under-resourced and not fully trained to meet these needs. The GPs we spoke to faced strict referral rules, long waiting lists, short appointments, and limited mental health training. The teachers we spoke to also felt pressure to support students without the resources or guidance they need. After hearing these findings, a group of young people from the “missing middle” (those struggling but not qualifying for specialist care) recommended: Training all school and college staff in mental health. Better support for apprentices at work. Peer support groups in schools, colleges, and universities. Safe spaces and housing support for LGBTQIA+ students. More help for young carers and fairer benefits. Better training for all health workers to support diverse communities. Looser referral rules so young people don’t have to be “ill enough” to get help. Youth hubs offering safe spaces, activities, and mental health support. Overall, the findings show the need for more inclusive, preventative, and joined-up mental health support for young people. Reflections on Young People involvement with shaping analysis framework for mental health .docx Download DOCX • 2.37MB What did we find out? Presented the findings at national and international conferences (e.g. MQ/DATAMIND, ADRUK, NIHR Statistics Group, EPA Epidemiology & Social Statistics, International Congress of the European Society for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry) Presented the findings at ARC Wessex webinar Presented findings on ARC Wessex website Where next? The young people who took part in our workshops were very clear about one thing: we need to start much earlier. They told us that helping children learn emotional skills, like understanding their feelings, managing stress, and asking for help, before stigma takes hold could make a big difference in preventing mental health problems later on. Taking this guidance seriously, our team has now grown to include experts who know how to design effective mental health programmes for primary schools, as well as researchers who can identify exactly which elements such a programme should include. Our next step is to develop a primary school–based intervention shaped by what young people told us matters most. Because this type of work sits outside ARC Wessex’s remit, we are now seeking external funding to take the project forward and bring this early-intervention programme to life. https://video.wixstatic.com/video/6fe132_c8aa61002b864940a8aac2b8d7754c07/480p/mp4/file.mp4 https://video.wixstatic.com/video/6fe132_ee6a84e1cd6a4745a6de0f05e2034688/480p/mp4/file.mp4 https://video.wixstatic.com/video/6fe132_fc53aac3539f4f839ea71adcfb34b517/720p/mp4/file.mp4 Olly Parker, Head of External Affairs and Research at YoungMinds , said: “This research from YoungMinds and the University of Southampton shines a vital light on the record numbers of young people needing mental health support. Growing up today is incredibly tough. Many young people are experiencing multiple pressures which impact their mental health, including poverty, inequality, intense academic pressure and the online world, so it’s no wonder so many are struggling. One of the clearest recommendations from the young people involved is the urgent need for early support hubs in every community. We know many young people face long waits for mental health support and become more unwell while waiting, which can lead to needing more urgent care. We need major reforms to address the root causes of poor mental health and for the Government to focus on reducing waiting lists so young people can get the support they need. The recent 10 Year Health Plan showed promising commitments with Young Futures Hubs and Mental Health Support Teams. These initiatives are vital to reducing pressures on the system, improving support and reducing waiting times - their rollout must be a political priority. But more is needed to tackle the scale of need - we need radical solutions that will address the reasons why so many young people are struggling in the first place.” Corine Driessens, one of the researchers based in Southampton, said: “It has been a truly wonderful and positive experience working with these groups of young people. Their innovative and fresh ideas across a wide range of ways to help others get the mental health support they need have been inspiring.”

Professor Ruth Bartlett - National lead for DEM-COMM, post-doctoral training scheme for applied dementia researchers across the ARCs < Back Alzheimer's Europe Conference DEM-COMM researchers in Geneva Professor Ruth Bartlett - National lead for DEM-COMM, post-doctoral training scheme for applied dementia researchers across the ARCs DEM-COMM was out in force at the 34th Alzheimer’s Europe conference in Geneva. We weren’t all wearing DEM-COMM emblazoned bobble hats (next time, maybe?) but there were twenty of us, all presenting work, supporting each other, and generally making the most of being at this important annual event. Our headline act was Dr Esther Loseto-Gerritzen from the University of Nottingham, ARC East Midlands. Esther gave her first plenary talk: ‘Online peer support for people with young onset dementia’ in the largest auditorium I’ve ever been in; it was like the United Nations (see photo below). So very well done to Esther. We’re all proud of you and look forward to supporting you in your new role as Junior Board member and representative of the INTERDEM Academy . Other DEM-COMM fellows shared their work in a parallel session or one of the quick oral presentations (5 minutes), or like me, presented a poster. Some people gave two or three presentations - extra brownie points to you guys. Here’s a list of all works in the order they were presented at the conference, followed by a collage of photos of each person giving their talk. Oral presentations Hannah Wheat ‘Findings of the realist mixed methods, longitudinal evaluation of the D-PACT (dementia personalised care team), primary care based, post-diagnostic, dementia care model’. Amirah Akhtar ‘Depression and dementia risk: exploring the impact of cognitive dysfunction during recurrent depression in middle-aged British South Asians: A qualitative study. Orri McDermott ‘Co-working with local Caribbean communities to raise awareness and normalise talking about dementia’. Neil Chadborn ‘Yaad participatory project: exploring memories with South Asian Communities to understand the context of family of care for people with dementia’. Marie Poole ‘Understanding post-diagnostic dementia support through football organisations to provide person-centred, culturally appropriate support for underserved communities’. James Faraday ‘Better mealtimes for people living with dementia: working with care homes to share good practice’. Rasa Mikelyte ‘Inclusion from the start: co-development and application of a priority setting method for dementia care research’. Emma Elliot ‘Physical activity interventions for hospitalised patients with dementia: systematic review’. Orri McDermott ‘Lived experience of advance care planning and shared decision making’. Rasa Mikelyte ‘Co-designing an easy-read measure of care-related quality of life: reflections on involving people living with dementia and their supporters’. Megan Rose Readman ‘Understanding the experience of hearing loss for people living with lewy body or parkinson’s disease dementia. Emmanuel S. Nwofe ‘DEM-SAFE: co-designing information campaigns to promote brain health and reduce dementia risk in south Asian and African Caribbean communities in the UK’. Amirah Akhtar ‘DEM-SAFE: Living well with dementia for south Asian and African Caribbean communities in the UK’. Posters Jiamin Du ‘Prevalence and correlates of neuro-psychiatric symptoms in individuals referred to a memory clinic, and the distress experienced by their caregivers’. Hannah Wheat ‘Triadic communication during dementia care: a conversation analytical study. Megan Polden ‘Music Make Us! The impact of singing and dancing interventions on people living with dementia’. Tamara Backhouse ‘How can we improve personal care assistance for people living with dementia to reduce refusals of care? A realist synthesis Juanita Hoe ‘Risk Assessment in people living with dementia: a systematic review’. Esther Loseto-Gerritzen ‘Online peer support for people living with dementia: a scoping review’. Hannah Wheat ‘Supporting dementia support workers to adapt to their role within a primary care setting: what works, for whom and in what circumstances’. Ruth Bartlett ‘Building capacity in applied dementia research’. Chris Poyner ‘Personalising domiciliary dementia care via co-designed computational matching: a study protocol’. Ilianna Lourida ‘Data-driven discovery of associations between prescribed medication and dementia risk: a systematic review’. Emmanuel S. Nwofe ‘Dementia risk factors and brain health: a scoping review of interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness among minority ethnic populations in OECD countries’. Thanks to Sarah Smith for darting around the venue to take these shots, great job! Previous Next

32e7d264-0fc5-4abd-9de2-3d80f41ddbb6 PROCED: PROactive, Collaborative and Efficient complex Discharge Joint Lead: Dr Carlos Lamas Fernandez and Professor Michael Boniface . Co Applicants : Antonio Martinez-Sykora (CORMSIS), Professor Peter Griffiths, Abigail Barkham (Southern Health NHS FT), Eleanor Corbett Partners: University of Southampton, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust & University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust. Lay Summary Aims: PROCED aims to improve complex hospital discharge by using computer algorithms to support the way community and social care services are planned for patients fit to leave hospital. The goal is to avoid patients staying in in hospital longer than needed when they are well enough to be discharged. Leaving hospital at the right time is better for patients for many reasons. It reduces physical and mental deconditioning and chance of hospital infections. It also allows patients to recover with families, friends, and carers. By planning care earlier during hospital stays, PROCED aims to provide more time for patients and families to discuss care needs with care workers. Also, integrated care services are expected to be more efficient as resources can be planned using better predictions of patient needs. Background : In 2018/2019 patient discharges from hospital in the UK were delayed by over 1.5 million days. Almost 75% of delays were due to arrangements for community care not being in place. Plans require many services including further non-acute care, residential homes, nursing homes, care packages, community equipment and public funding. Avoiding delays to discharge from hospital is desirable as it leads to better outcomes. The University Hospital Southampton has recently developed a digital system supporting complex discharge. The system allows patients, families, and care providers to share information about a care needs and resources during discharge decisions. PROCED will now extend this system with advanced computer algorithms to support better decisions making. Approach: PROCED will develop computer algorithms that can predict care needs and schedule care services. Predictions will be developed using machine learning. Machine learning is a way to train a computer by using data about patients and services they use. Scheduling will use optimisation algorithms to find the best use of resources from available options. The prediction and scheduling algorithms will be integrated within a discharge decision process. The process will be part of a patient journey co-designed with patients and healthcare workers. The algorithms will be tested to ensure they are accurate and useful.The approach will be assessed by patients and the workforce for acceptance and overall satisfaction. Patient and Public Involvemen t: Patients and public have helped develop the research concept and will be involved in co-design, testing and evaluation. PPI will influence data usage, patient journey, algorithms, and visualisation. The public will participant in a Steering Committee. A PPI Committee will organise eight workshops to involve patients and public in the research. Dissemination: Communication materials will engage the public and decision makers.Evidence of effectiveness, safety and acceptance will be published. A complex discharge system with computer-based decision support will be demonstrated. The outcomes will be championed with institutional, regional, and national implementation teams.

d7cea2fb-fab3-4e8d-86f6-e2d2952f0404 ADOPTED: Nurture-U (Southampton): A longitudinal survey for student metal health and wellbeing Principal Investigator: Lucy Dorey Start Date: 1 July 2021 End Date: 1 July 2025 Background: Promoting good mental health within university students is a priority. Anxiety, depression and self-harm are rapidly increasing. University mental health services report demand beyond their capacity. Effective ways to prevent student mental difficulties are urgently needed. Further, university should be a positive life experience and promote students' emotional fitness and ability to thrive. Research and student feedback recommend changing university culture, environment and teaching to promote wellbeing. Stepped care in which students move through different steps based on need is also suggested to improve student wellbeing and service capacity. This starts with wellbeing promotion and prevention for all students, steps up to self-help for those with mild symptoms and to professional support for those with elevated symptoms. However, these approaches have not been rigorously tested in universities. We don't know which elements best promote good student mental health. We don't know what approaches work best for the diverse student body across gender, ethnicity, sexuality, sociodemographic background. We will test initiatives within the university environment and at each of the steps, see which initiatives students use, how well they work, and identify which work best for which students across diverse groups. Students will be active partners in shaping, delivering and evaluating all research. We will use repeated twice-yearly online surveys across 6 universities (110k undergraduates) to assess student wellbeing and mental health and understand what helps or hinders students seeking and getting help. A digital self-monitoring tool allows students to track their wellbeing, stress, and what support they use over time so we can map how they move through stepped care and how different steps interact with each other. To test whether changing university environment promotes wellbeing, first we will evaluate embedding compassion into education: teaching about diversity and mental health, practising kindness and understanding for self and others, and making assessment more flexible and responsive to students. Focus groups will explore how students experience this approach. Second, we will introduce a voluntary online mental health literacy course for first year undergraduates that teaches what influences mental health, how to promote wellbeing and how to seek help. Surveys before and after the course will test if it increases students' knowledge, healthy behaviours, helps-seeking and wellbeing. To better understand how to make self-help work for students, randomised trials will test book-based guided self-help to build personal strengths, unguided digital self-help to prevent depression in high-worrying students and digital self-help for depression and anxiety. We will compare supported versus unsupported digital cognitive-behavioural therapy, meditation and peer support apps to find out which app(s) students find most acceptable and explore which students most benefit from. We will test self-help with and without support because unsupported self-help can reach vastly more people and there is uncertainty about whether and for whom supported self-help is more effective. To improve the efficiency of student mental health services, we will test if adding a digital self-monitoring tool shared between student and clinician improves student experience and time to recovery by enabling care to be more proactive and responsive (e.g., more frequent meetings if symptoms rise). From this research, we will develop an evidence-based integrated model of inclusive and acceptable student wellbeing and mental health support. In partnership with students and university leaders, this model will inform policy recommendations. We will develop guidance, courses and tools to promote student wellbeing that are easily added to existing systems or that use tried-and-tested low-cost technology to ease their adoption and ongoing use.

a2f4485f-e939-4775-b10a-095900320a55 FinCH Implementation study: Falls prevention in care homes led by NIHR ARC East Midlands working with NIHR ARC North East North Cumbria, NIHR ARC West Midlands and NIHR ARC South London. Project: Falls in Care Homes (FinCH Imp2 study) Principle Investigator: Professor Pip Logan Team members: Dr Jane Horne , Dr Fran Allen, Maureen Godfrey , Professor Adam Gordon , Professor John Gladman , Dr Katie Robinson , Dr Paul Leighton , Dr Janet Darby , Michael Fletcher, Professor Gillian Manthorpe , Professor Barbara Hanratty , Professor Dan Lasserson , Professor Elizabeth Orton . Partners: Nottingham University Hospitals (NHS) Trust; Leicestershire County Council (Local Government); University of Newcastle, Kings College London; NHS Bromley CCG; Northumbria-Healthcare NHS Trust. Research sites: East Midlands , North East (North Cumbria), West Midlands and South London. Starts: 1/10/2021 Ends: 30/9/2023 Lay Summary People who live in care homes are at great risk of falling. Falls are common, harmful, costly, and difficult to prevent. The Guide to Action for Falls Prevention Care Homes (GtACH) programme trains and supports care home staff to identify the reasons why residents fall and then guides them to complete actions to reduce falls. In a large multicentre randomised controlled trial called the FinCH trial (1), the GtACH programme was cost-effective and reduced falls by 43%. We now need to research how to deliver the GtACH programme in ‘real life’ outside a research trial. We will work with three regions – East Midlands, South London and the North-East - to develop and research ideas about taking up the GtACH training programme which can be used nationwide. Using an approach to talking to people in care homes called Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) we will consider the work that people do in managing falls to assess whether GtACH becomes routine practice. NPT will help us to think about those things which help and those which hinder the adoption of GtACH. We have three work packages: WP1. Quality Improvement Collaboratives (QIC) will bring care home and healthcare staff together to develop and research ways to implement the GtACH. WP2. The QIC site teams will implement GtACH in 25 care homes per region (60 in total). Data from all homes and residents (about 2000 residents) will tell us the extent to which GtACH has been taken up in the homes. WP3. We will develop ‘toolkits’ of materials for care homes; containing the GtACH, a ‘return on investment’ calculator, the implementation package, and a ‘how to’ guide for establishing Communities of Practice to deliver and sustain the GtACH across regions. This study has been developed in collaboration with care home managers, care home staff, NHS clinicians and our active Patient, Public, Involvement (PPI) group who are co applicants. Going forward we have identified new PPI partners from Ashington and Bromley. We will talk by videoconferencing if needed. The study will be completed by July 2023 and we will disseminate our findings on the ARC-EM website, producing a short trailer video for YouTube, and through articles in journals and MyHomeLife Magazine. We will link our website on the national forums of the National Care Forum, Skills for Care, and Care England, Age UK, and the Alzheimer’s Society, and hold webinars for funders and managers Method Using monthly stakeholder meetings, consensus groups, interviews and literature searching we re-designed the GtACH into a suite of resources that care homes were happy to use and renamed it, on their request, to the Action Falls programme. Using an implementation theory called Normalisation Programme Theory we designed a research study to test how the Action Falls programme worked in 60 real world care homes. Care homes are being recruited across four ARC locations. All care home staff included in the 60 homes are being invited to complete the Action Falls training and complete a questionnaire (called the NoMAD) to assess how ready they are to use the programme. Interviews with care home staff and the trainers are being completed to get a first-hand view of how well the Action Falls is getting embedded into routine care. Care home staff are coming together in supportive collaborations, called Action falls Collaborations (AFC) to share knowledge, with researchers collecting data at these events. Results Ethical approval for the study has been granted by HRA East Midlands and Derby Research Ethics Committee Ref: 22\EM\0035. The study is adopted by the NIHR portfolio and the NIHR Clinical Research Network are helping to deliver the study in all locations, which are listed below in brackets. 36 care homes (60%) have been recruited, 13 in ARC North East (NE), 9 ARC London South (SE), 14 ARC East Midlands (EM). ARC West Midlands (WM) will start recruitment soon. In the ARC EM location we have four separate NHS Trusts/ Local authority areas involved. 7 NHS/ Local Authority/HEI Falls Leads have been trained in ARC’s NE, LS and EM and have begun training of the care home staff across the locations. One AFC has taken place in NE with the East Midlands AFC and South London due to take place later this month. The NoMAD questionnaires have been delivered to care homes. No interviews have yet been completed as these are due to start in November. In addition to the four locations the team have interacted with 83 individual care homes and 47 stakeholder groups sending them the Action Falls resources and talking over how they might be used, but no training has been offered. The images below show the spread of these enquiries Conclusion The study is progressing well, and care homes are very keen to take part and recruitment for the study is currently at 60%. The sites are set up and staff are in posts. We are approximately three months behind target on the activities due to care homes being reluctant to engage early in 2022 due to COVID. We consider that we may need a no cost 6-month extension to complete all the activities and to also get the Action Falls programme ready for wider spread. All our study meetings are well attended, and we have good participation from our PPI members with information being communicated from out Study Steering Group to the Stakeholders and vice versa sharing knowledge and experience. The study has gathered a lot of interest from outside of the study areas, from care homes and a range of other stakeholders. The research team have been sending out study materials and meeting with these groups over MS Teams meetings sharing resources and information about the study.A PhD student will be working with the care homes outside of our study locations from October 2022.

0ff85ad2-7ff5-49d4-b71c-0a912cb8f020 ADOPTED PROJECT: The Gateway Study a randomised controlled trial, economic and qualitative evaluation to examine the effectiveness of an out-of-court community-based Gateway intervention programme aimed at improving health and well-being for young adult offenders; victim satisfaction and reducing recidivism Completed A single-site pragmatic Randomised Control Trial to examine the effectiveness of an OCBI known as ‘Gateway’ on improving health and well-being of offenders aged 18-24, as well as reducing recidivism and improving victim satisfaction Chief Investigator: Professor Julie Parkes – University of Southampton Project Team Members Dr Sara Morgan – University of Southampton, Dr Inna Walker – University of Southampton, Professor Catherine Hewitt – University of York, Professor David Torgerson – University of York, Professor Jenny Fleming – University of Southampton, Professor James Raftery – University of Southampton, Inspector Stu Baker – Hampshire Constabulary Sergeant Caroline Chapman – Hampshire Constabulary, Dr Alison Booth – University of York, Mrs Ann Cochrane – University of York, Mr Alex Mitchell – University of York, Mrs Valerie Wadsworth – University of York, Mrs Megan Barlow-Pay – University of Southampton, Ms Lana Weir – University of Southampton. Organisations Involved: Hampton Trust charity, No Limits charity, Aurora New Dawn, Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary Started: 1/3/2018 Ended: 31/8/2022 Background Young adult offenders commonly have a range of health and social needs, making them vulnerable to mental health problems. If you are aged between 18-24 years old and have committed a crime, you may need to attend court and face convictions or prison. However, many believe that more should be done to prevent young adults from entering the criminal justice system in the first place. The study aims to determine whether a new out of court programme, named Gateway, improves the health and wellbeing of young adult offenders aged 18-24, and influences their chance of offending again, and gives victim satisfaction. The Gateway programme is issued as a conditional caution and has been developed by Hampshire Constabulary (HC), in partnership with local community groups, with an aim to improve the life chances of young adult offenders. In the programme, a mentor assesses the needs of each adult and develops a care pathway with referrals to healthcare. The young adult offenders then participate in two workshops about empathy, and the causes and consequences of their behaviour. Such intervention programmes are believed to improve the health and well-being of young offenders and reduce criminal behaviour. However, there is currently little information about the extent of this improvement. To find out whether the programme works, this research study compares a group of young adult offenders taking part in the Gateway programme as a conditional caution with a group of non- participants who are required to appear in court or given a different conditional caution. Publications An out-of-court community-based programme to improve the health and well-being of young adult offenders: the Gateway RCT | NIHR Journals Library

ARC Wessex Early Career Researchers - Cara Black, Naomi Leonard, Olivia Taylor and Annabelle Prescott < Back Engaging Children and Young People in Research Community of Practice Inaugural Meeting ARC Wessex Early Career Researchers - Cara Black, Naomi Leonard, Olivia Taylor and Annabelle Prescott September 2023, University of York, UK There is a knowledge gap in our understanding about approaches and methods for meaningfully involving and engaging with children and young people in matters and decisions that impact on them. We went to a two-day meeting at the University of York with researchers from the University of York, Bristol, Hertfordshire, Southampton and Auckland, NZ as well as a representative from the International Alliance of Mental Health Research Funders. This group came together to form an international Community of Practice (CoP), with the goal of sharing learning, methods, and experience for effective ways to engage young people. It also highlighted the wide variety of opportunities for putting children and young people at the heart of research, decision making and advocacy for their mental health and well-being. Here are our reflections as early career researchers (ECRs) from the meeting: What did we gain from the meeting? We thoroughly enjoyed being with professionals who have expertise in research for youth health, wellbeing, mental health, and youth advocacy. We gained an understanding of what exactly a community of practice is, listened to the experiences of all members and contributed to the conversations. It was lovely to hear international voices and get to exchange creative ideas for involving young people and encouraging them to share their ideas, as well as learning a great deal about youth engagement in general. What were our highlights? Hearing from the Healthy Mind Apprentices; Chloe, Kenzie, Lauren & Phoebe who are a group of young people passionate about mental health who work across Bradford and Craven to support young people, communities and schools with their health and wellbeing. They reflected on their time working with Y-MHESH and spoke about what their apprenticeship meant to them and what they have learned along the way. They shared with us that the problem is not that young people don’t have a voice; they instead believe that decision makers are not listening. Therefore, it was interesting to hear that we need to take necessary steps to ensure ‘decision makers’ are able and willing to share the decision-making power with young people. Overall being involved in the CoP was positive, as we had the opportunity to be involved in discussions with leaders in the field. Often, we can become ‘stuck’ in our ideas, so having the opportunity to present new ideas and challenge our Community of Practice to think in novel ways which align with the realities for children and young people was a highlight for sure. What could have been improved? It might have been more beneficial for our CoP group if the Healthy Mind Apprentices joined us for longer, as these fabulous young people reminded us that it is about listening and valuing meaningful involvement of children and young people, so it would have been great to have more youth representation in our own decision-making processes. Youth voices should be included throughout our CoP meetings, whether this be the Healthy Mind apprentices or groups of different young people. One of the main challenges in this area is that when coproduction and research is done with young people, they often don’t see the outputs they have created or get to feel the impact of their work before they move. It’s important we consider this when setting out to do co-production work or research with children and young people. What are the advantages of involving early career researchers in research and in the CoP? We provide a fresh perspective on topical issues today and have greater freedom to think beyond our specialty areas. This gives us the ability to consider the broader picture at an international or societal level and bridge the gap between young people and established researchers, as we understand the points of view and needs of young people, while simultaneously understanding research processes. This meeting was a great way to solidify the learning from the CoP and focus us on a clear path forward to best support the goals of children and young people in research. Reflections Reflections on public engagement and engagement in research for young people From the perspective of an ECR, it seems extremely important that “brand image” and visibility are recognised by senior management at universities and funders at research centers. Engaging well with the public, in this case, young people, both heightens visibility and reinforces brand image, which is why Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) work with young people within schools, young people’s PPI groups and other youth groups, including the Healthy Mind Apprenticeship scheme, is so valuable. Although, it can be difficult to get PPIE work funded. The purpose of PPIE work is to get people’s views on what needs to be researched and what is important to them, so to do this after a project has been decided defeats the purpose. Young people form part of our communities, but their inputs have been historically overlooked as unimportant or uninformed. Yet, some of the most valuable insights come from our young people, because at the end of the day this is their reality, and they live it every day. It is therefore crucial to have young people be meaningfully engaged so research, funding and decisions are aligned with what people want and need – and children and young people should be no exception. If we consider and give power to the voices of young people, then perhaps we can work to meaningfully elevate the health and wellbeing of entire future communities. So with that, we leave you with this whakatauki (Māori proverb). Mā whero, mā pango ka oti ai te mahi With red and black the work will be complete https://video.wixstatic.com/video/6fe132_dc59b9a176b94aa791cb13bf6997b1fa/1080p/mp4/file.mp4 Previous Next

03ec3658-b736-400b-ba5c-c0762b7b0f06 Understanding, addressing, and meeting the complex needs of people living with long term physical and mental health conditions: a qualitative study Lead applicant: Prof Mari Carmen Portillo and Dr Leire Ambrosio Co-applicants: Prof David Baldwin, Dr Lindsey Cherry, Dr Kate Lippiett, Dr Pritti Aggarwal, Mr William Barnaby Jones, Dr Sara McKelvie What problem will the research address and what evidence do you have this is a major concern for the public and health and care providers of Wessex? People with long term physical conditions are 2-3 times more likely to have mental health problems than the general population: at least 30% of adults with such conditions also have mental health problems (like anxiety and depression). People living with physical and mental long term conditions experience hardships relating to health, and have complex psychosocial, environmental, financial, and spiritual needs. Healthcare professionals find it difficult to provide fully integrated care for these populations, due to systematic barriers and fragmentation of services. The NHS has incorporated an initiative involving Social Prescribing Link Workers (SPLW) in response to these complex needs. SPLWs connect people to community local services to meet needs through a comprehensive person-centred approach. However, the way in which this initiative occurs in different areas and services is variable, and there is unclear guidance for primary care services about how to integrate this novel workforce into wider efforts to address and meet the complex needs of people living with long term physical and mental conditions. Where will the research take place and who will you involve? The project will be undertaken in primary care practices in Hampshire, the Isle of Wight and Oxfordshire, and with a range of local third sector organizations (e.g., Anxiety UK, Mind). Semi-structured interviews will be undertaken with people living with long term physical and mental health conditions. Subsequent focus groups will explore the range of care provider perspectives (e.g., social prescribing link workers, GPs, nurses, practice managers). We expect to interview 20-25 individuals and conduct 4-6 focus groups with 6-8 participants per group. Maximum variation sampling will focus on sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic background), with a sharp focus on disadvantage and deprivation. Overall aim: To determine the barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of the SPLW role in primary care for individuals living with long term physical and mental conditions. Specific objectives. Identify the range of health and social needs of people living with long term physical and mental conditions. Explore provider perspectives about social prescribing link workers role implementation and effectiveness for people living with long term physical and mental conditions. Explore user perspectives about social prescribing link workers role implementation and effectiveness Explore how, SPLW implementation methods can be adapted to better meet the needs of culturally diverse populations including those living within deprived areas. Explore potential limitations of SPLW model for people living with long term physical and mental conditions. Co-produce recommendations to enable effective implementation of social prescribing link workers to address health and social needs of people living with long term physical and mental conditions. A qualitative design, utilising semi-structured interviews and focus groups will be conducted. Patients and the public will contribute to all aspects of the research process. How will the findings inform improvements in population health and patient care. Following this study, a comprehensive tailored programme will be developed to address the complex needs of people with long term physical and mental conditions including those living in deprived areas. Plans for its implementation will be explored involving key stakeholders from and integrated Care System (ICS), Primary care Networks (PCNs), Local Authorities and any other organizations/sectors that may benefit from the findings. Publications https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7191247

fb112e5b-f7be-4ada-a37c-8e959119e1c3 Adolescent Resilience to OVercome Adversity: EmpoweRment and intervention development – the ROVER study Lead applicant: Anne-Sophie Darlington Co-applicants : Professor Graham Roberts , Professor Mary Barker , Dr Ivo Vassilev University of Southampton, Dr Catherine Hill Associate Professor in Child Health at the University of Southampton, Dr Jana Kreppner Associate Professor in Developmental Psychopathology within Psychology at the University of Southampton , Dr Luise Marino , Abigail Oakley Project Summary: Mental health conditions and symptoms in children and young people are increasing. Children and young people (CYP) with a chronic physical health condition often report having mental health problems such as feelings of anxiety and depression. A lot of research has focused on risk – circumstances that make it more likely for young people to experience mental health problems. In this project we want to focus on resilience - the young person’s ability to use their strengths and support from family and friends to overcome challenges in their life. Resilience has not often been a focus of support programmes for CYP with a physical condition. We would like to find out what experiences are common for young people living with physical health conditions, so that we can develop a support programme that applies across Child Health. We will use knowledge from these shared experiences to co-create the support programme with young people – called ‘tools for life’ (suggestion by CYP). We will also partner with national charities (partnerships have already been developed) who have worked with us before and who are very interested in supporting CYP around their mental health. The charity partners could help us to develop support components that are very specific to the condition (for example, fear of cancer coming back), which can be included in the overall support programme. Finally, work with young people has taught us that flexibility is very important: flexibility in when they access support, the way they access it and how it is offered to them. We will work together with young to shape this flexibility in support. The project will have four parts: Part 1 – Finding out what might work: List successful support components from 15 existing summaries of the evidence (reviews of the literature) to date and a report from Wellcome (an independent global charitable foundation which focuses on research), and identify the support elements (e.g., building confidence) which work well, and are acceptable to young people. Part 2 – Developing partnerships: Develop a partnership with local stakeholders (e.g., Paul Hughes and Laura Renishaw-Villier – Hub stakeholders; SolentMind, No Limits) and national charities (e.g., Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group, Kidney Care UK, Asthma UK). who can support the development of the support programme, both the general as disease-specific elements. We will hold several workshops with stakeholders to develop the partnership and agree on the goals of the partnership and ways to work together. Part 3 – Developing the support programme: We will co-create (develop together with young people) the support programme– ‘tools for life’ - to increase resilience. We will focus on flexibility in the way the programme is offered to young people, and when young people access the programme, to suit their needs. This flexibility will make young people more likely to use the programme. Part 4: Testing the support programme: We will test the support programme with 30 young people, to find out how many young people use the programme, if the programme is acceptable, how they use the programme, and how much they use the programme. We will also find out what the most important indicators of success are for the programme, such as young people experiencing less symptoms of anxiety and depression, and a better quality of life. What did we find out? The problem: Children and young people with a physical health condition are at a higher risk of developing mental health problems. Existing support programmes do not focus on building resilience – the ability to bounce back and stay mentally strong by using available resources and support networks when facing challenges. Also, many programmes fail to keep young people engaged. This project aimed to explore the support needs of young people and the best way to deliver a programme that builds resilience. What we did: We reviewed existing support programmes from the literature. Then we interviewed young people (32 with a physical health condition, and 25 without, ages 11-18 years), 12 parents of young people aged 11-17 years, and 5 healthcare providers from hospitals, charities and schools across the UK. A range of health conditions were represented, including cancer, heart disease, type 1 diabetes, and asthma. The interviews explored key stressors young people face, the support they need, and preferences for how support should be delivered. What we found: Priority stressors were related to managing the health condition, school/social life, and the future. Key support strategies identified included: 1) Normalisation through connection with other young people (e.g. chat forums), peer training (e.g. ‘living with a health condition’ in school curriculum); 2) Coping, including practical methods (e.g. knowing what to expect during hospital visits), and skills for navigating changes in peer relationships; 3) Prompt reassurance from healthcare providers during hospital visits, via text messaging service, and access to youth workers. Participants preferred a flexible approach that combined online resources with in-person support. Potential impact: Based on our findings, we have developed a prototype support programme that combines online resources with access to healthcare providers for timely reassurance and problem-solving. We are now seeking feedback from young people on this prototype and will use their input to create a full-scale version. If the support programme proves effective, it could help improve the mental health of young people with a physical health condition. What is the impact of this knowledge? • Relationship building: We established strong links with key stakeholders, including clinical colleagues across paediatric specialties at University Hospital Southampton (UHS), representatives from Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB, Dorset HealthCare, and national and regional disease charities. These collaborations supported participant recruitment and informed intervention development. In the long-term, these relationships will be crucial in ensuring the widespread implementation of the intervention across the health and care system. • Embedding of EDI and PPIE: We conducted extensive PPIE work with community groups, including Winchester Youth Council, Breakout Youth, and Yellow Brick Road, ensuring that the voices of children and young people (CYP) from diverse backgrounds, including those from the LGBTQIA+ community and socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, were represented in the study. • Empowerment of young people: CYP gained a strong sense of empowerment and an enhanced awareness of their own resilience and well-being while contributing to the study. This impact was far-reaching, as the study included patients from UHS paediatric units, and students from local schools (Toynbee and Applemore) and colleges (Eastleigh College and Sparsholt College). • Novel insights into well-being: This study provided novel insights into resilience and well-being for CYP, enriching the broader narrative on CYP mental health. We also co-developed several prototype intervention proposals, which will pave the way for creating an intervention to improve resilience and mental health for young people within healthcare settings. What Next • We are currently: seeking feedback from young people on the prototype resilience intervention preparing a manuscript for submission to a high-impact a peer-reviewed journal. The findings from this study will be inform the development of a grant application, aimed at co-creating the full-scale resilience intervention with input from young people and their support networks. If the intervention proves effective, it will be implemented in practice to bolster mental health outcomes for young people with a physical chronic condition, while also reducing the burden on health and social care services.